Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) is bringing DevOps [1] capabilities to current networks, reducing the time-to-market for new services and thereby providing a strong incentive for adoption to Service Providers and Network Operators. However, the current SDN landscape is extremely fragmented, so that different open and closed source controller frameworks such as OpenDaylight [2], Ryu [3], Floodlight [4] or ONOS [5] exist. This jeopardises the gains of introducing SDN, since porting SDN applications from one platform to another is time consuming and requires high effort. As a consequence, SDN users (e.g. network operators) face the danger of vendor (or platform) lock-in: they are confined to applications working for the platform of their choice, or forced to re-implement their solutions when they choose a new platform. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/NETSOFT.2016.7502408 | 2016 IEEE NetSoft Conference and Workshops (NetSoft) |
Keywords | DocType | Citations |
NetIDE,SDN application,software-defined networking,DevOps,service provider,network operator,controller framework,OpenDaylight,Ryu,floodlight,ONOS,vendor lock-in | Conference | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 3 | 10 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pedro A. Aranda-Gutiérrez | 1 | 24 | 6.37 |
| Elisa Rojas | 2 | 2 | 0.98 |
| Arne Schwabe | 3 | 2 | 0.72 |
| Christian Stritzke | 4 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Roberto Doriguzzi Corin | 5 | 116 | 14.39 |
| Alec Leckey | 6 | 2 | 0.98 |
| Giuseppe Petralia | 7 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Antonio Marsico | 8 | 1 | 0.36 |
| Kevin Phemius | 9 | 87 | 5.26 |
| S. Tamurejo | 10 | 1 | 0.36 |