Title | ||
---|---|---|
A comparative study on decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for many-objective optimization. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Many-objective optimization problems pose challenges to the Pareto-based multi-objective optimization algorithms. Recent studies have suggested that decomposition is a promising method to improve the performance of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms on many-objective optimization problem. Various methods based on decomposition have been developed to solve many-objective problems in recent years. However, the existing experimental comparative studies are usually limited to only a few methods based on decomposition. This paper offers a systematic comparison of seven representative decomposition-based approaches tested on two groups of widely used problems. The experimental results have demonstrated that none of the compared algorithms has a clear advantage over the others, although different algorithms are competitive on different test problems. Therefore, a careful selection of algorithms is necessary in handling a many-objective problem in hand. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/CEC.2016.7744096 | CEC |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
MOEA/D,HYPERVOLUME,PERFORMANCE,OPTIMALITY | Mathematical optimization,Evolutionary algorithm,Computer science,L-reduction,Test functions for optimization,Evolutionary computation,Multi-objective optimization,Artificial intelligence,Imperialist competitive algorithm,Optimization problem,Machine learning,Metaheuristic | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 27 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xiaoliang Ma | 1 | 182 | 18.51 |
Junshan Yang | 2 | 29 | 1.75 |
Nuosi Wu | 3 | 1 | 1.03 |
Zhen Ji | 4 | 138 | 10.84 |
Zexuan Zhu | 5 | 989 | 57.41 |