Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
•Few studies consider name generators in developing country settings or using sociocentric data.•We show how networks differ by name generator using sociocentric data from India.•Domestic interaction networks were the most clustered and highly centralized.•Status difference between social contacts varied across name generators.•Some questions uncovered networks that were very specific to the local context. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.08.008 | Social Networks |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Name generators,Social norms,India,Homophily,Sociocentric,Social networks,Social hierarchy | Generalizability theory,Social psychology,Social network,Homophily,Norm (social),Psychology,NOMINATE,Respondent,Caste,Social status | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
48 | 0378-8733 | 3 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.44 | 5 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Holly B. Shakya | 1 | 3 | 0.44 |
Nicholas A Christakis | 2 | 508 | 36.92 |
James H. Fowler | 3 | 55 | 3.80 |