Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Given a bipartite graph G, we consider the decision problem called BicliqueCover for a fixed positive integer parameter k where we are asked whether the edges of G can be covered with at most k complete bipartite subgraphs (a.k.a. bicliques). In the BicliquePartition problem, we have the additional constraint that each edge should appear in exactly one of the k bicliques. These problems are both known to be NP-complete but fixed parameter tractable. However, the known FPT algorithms have a running time that is doubly exponential in k, and the best known kernel for both problems is exponential in k. We build on this kernel and improve the running time for BicliquePartition to O*(2^{2k^2+k*log(k)+k}) by exploiting a linear algebraic view on this problem. On the other hand, we show that no such improvement is possible for BicliqueCover unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) is false by proving a doubly exponential lower bound on the running time. We achieve this by giving a reduction from 3SAT on n variables to an instance of BicliqueCover with k=O(log(n)). As a further consequence of this reduction, we show that there is no subexponential kernel for BicliqueCover unless P=NP. Finally, we point out the significance of the exponential kernel mentioned above for the design of polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the optimization versions of both problems. That is, we show that it is possible to obtain approximation factors of n/log(n) for both problems, whereas the previous best approximation factor was n/sqrt(log(n)). |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2016 | IPEC | Integer,Approximation algorithm,Complete bipartite graph,Discrete mathematics,Combinatorics,Parameterized complexity,Upper and lower bounds,Boolean satisfiability problem,Bipartite graph,Mathematics,Exponential time hypothesis |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| L. Sunil Chandran | 1 | 552 | 54.01 |
| Davis Issac | 2 | 1 | 2.40 |
| Andreas Karrenbauer | 3 | 133 | 20.21 |