Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Recently, computer-aided celiac disease diagnosis has been promoted to provide an objective opinion besides histological examination of biopsies and visual assessment of macroscopic mucosal tissue. State-of-the-art techniques, however, are not accurate enough to provide incentive for clinical deployment. In this work, we answer two questions: Do computers and human experts make similar classification errors and can expert knowledge be utilized to increase the accuracy of computer-aided methods. Three experts were asked to perform visual classification of a large number of images. The experts decisions were combined with nine different state-of-the-art image representations. Experimentation showed that the correlations between two computer-based methods were higher than the correlations between an expert and a computer-based method. Furthermore, the inclusion of expert knowledge led to statistically significant (p <; 0.05) improvements in 69 out of 108 investigated settings. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1109/IPTA.2016.7821009 | 2016 Sixth International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
human knowledge,computer-aided celiac disease diagnosis,histological biopsy examination,visual assessment,macroscopic mucosal tissue,classification errors,expert knowledge,visual classification,state-of-the-art image representations | Computer vision,Disease,Software deployment,Incentive,Visualization,Medical imaging,Computer science,Visual assessment,Image representation,Human knowledge,Artificial intelligence,Machine learning | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
2154-512X | 978-1-4673-8911-2 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Michael Gadermayr | 1 | 74 | 15.65 |
Hubert Kogler | 2 | 3 | 1.08 |
Maximilian Karla | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
Andreas Vécsei | 4 | 167 | 18.36 |
Andreas Uhl | 5 | 1958 | 223.07 |
Dorit Merhof | 6 | 189 | 55.02 |