Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We present functions that can be computed in some fixed polynomial time but are hard on average for any algorithm that runs in slightly smaller time, assuming widely-conjectured worst-case hardness for problems from the study of fine-grained complexity. Unconditional constructions of such functions are known from before (Goldmann et al., IPL â94), but these have been canonical functions that have not found further use, while our functions are closely related to well-studied problems and have considerable algebraic structure. Based on the average-case hardness and structural properties of our functions, we outline the construction of a Proof of Work scheme and discuss possible approaches to constructing fine-grained One-Way Functions. We also show how our reductions make conjectures regarding the worst-case hardness of the problems we reduce from (and consequently the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis) heuristically falsifiable in a sense similar to that of (Naor, CRYPTO â03). We prove our hardness results in each case by showing fine-grained reductions from solving one of three problems â namely, Orthogonal Vectors (OV), 3SUM, and All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP) â in the worst case to computing our function correctly on a uniformly random input. The conjectured hardness of OV and 3SUM then gives us functions that require n2âo(1) time to compute on average, and that of APSP gives us a function that requires n3âo(1) time. Using the same techniques we also obtain a conditional average-case time hierarchy of functions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1145/3055399.3055466 | IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Average-Case Complexity,Fine-Grained Complexity,Cryptography,Heuristic Falsifiability,Proofs of Work,Worst-Case to Average-Case Reduction | Journal | 2017 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0737-8017 | 6 | 0.44 |
References | Authors | |
10 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Marshall Ball | 1 | 44 | 8.81 |
Alon Rosen | 2 | 1360 | 60.54 |
Manuel Sabin | 3 | 11 | 1.93 |
Prashant Nalini Vasudevan | 4 | 38 | 9.09 |