Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
This paper discusses the philosophical and logical motivations for rejectivism, primarily by considering a dialogical approach to logic, which is formalized in a Question–Answer Semantics. We develop a generalised account of rejectivism through close consideration of Mark Textor’s arguments against rejectivism that the negative expression ‘No’ is never used as an act of rejection and is equivalent with a negative sentence. In doing so, we also shed light upon well-known issues regarding the supposed non-embeddability and non-iterability of force indicators. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1007/s11787-017-0170-7 | Logica Universalis |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Primary 03A05, Secondary 03B60, 03B65, Assertion, denial, rejectivism, embeddability, Question–Answer Semantics | Assertion,Algorithm,Denial,Epistemology,Sentence,Dialogical self,Semantics,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
11 | 2 | 1661-8297 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 6 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabien Schang | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| James Trafford | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |