Title | ||
---|---|---|
Demixing Sines And Spikes: Robust Spectral Super-Resolution In The Presence Of Outliers |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We consider the problem of super-resolving the line spectrum of a multisinusoidal signal from a finite number of samples, some of which may be completely corrupted. Measurements of this form can be modeled as an additive mixture of a sinusoidal and a sparse component. We propose to demix the two components and super-resolve the spectrum of the multisinusoidal signal by solving a convex program. Our main theoretical result is that-up to logarithmic factors-this approach is guaranteed to be successful with high probability for a number of spectral lines that is linear in the number of measurements, even if a constant fraction of the data are outliers. The result holds under the assumption that the phases of the sinusoidal and sparse components are random and the line spectrum satisfies a minimum-separation condition. We show that the method can be implemented via semi-definite programming, and explain how to adapt it in the presence of dense perturbations as well as exploring its connection to atomic-norm denoising. In addition, we propose a fast greedy demixing method that provides good empirical results when coupled with a local non-convex-optimization step. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2016 | 10.1093/imaiai/iax005 | INFORMATION AND INFERENCE-A JOURNAL OF THE IMA |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
atomic norm, continuous dictionary, convex optimization, greedy methods, line spectra estimation, outliers, semi-definite programming, sparse recovery, super-resolution | Noise reduction,Mathematical optimization,Finite set,Outlier,Spectral line,Regular polygon,Logarithm,Mathematics,Perturbation (astronomy),Semidefinite programming | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
7 | 1 | 2049-8764 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.37 | 0 |
Authors | ||
4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Carlos Fernandez-Granda | 1 | 154 | 13.21 |
Gongguo Tang | 2 | 505 | 36.29 |
Xiaodong Wang | 3 | 3958 | 310.41 |
Le Zheng | 4 | 84 | 9.88 |