Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Objective: We investigate whether deep learning techniques for natural language processing (NLP) can be used efficiently for patient phenotyping. Patient phenotyping is a classification task for determining whether a patient has a medical condition, and is a crucial part of secondary analysis of healthcare data. We assess the performance of deep learning algorithms and compare them with classical NLP approaches. Materials and Methods: We compare convolutional neural networks (CNNs), n-gram models, and approaches based on cTAKES that extract pre-defined medical concepts from clinical notes and use them to predict patient phenotypes. The performance is tested on 10 different phenotyping tasks using 1,610 discharge summaries extracted from the MIMIC-III database. Results: CNNs outperform other phenotyping algorithms in all 10 tasks. The average F1-score of our model is 76 (PPV of 83, and sensitivity of 71) with our model having an F1-score up to 37 points higher than alternative approaches. We additionally assess the interpretability of our model by presenting a method that extracts the most salient phrases for a particular prediction. Conclusion: We show that NLP methods based on deep learning improve the performance of patient phenotyping. Our CNN-based algorithm automatically learns the phrases associated with each patient phenotype. As such, it reduces the annotation complexity for clinical domain experts, who are normally required to develop task-specific annotation rules and identify relevant phrases. Our method performs well in terms of both performance and interpretability, which indicates that deep learning is an effective approach to patient phenotyping based on cliniciansu0027 notes. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2017 | arXiv: Computation and Language | Interpretability,Rule-based system,Annotation,Computer science,Convolutional neural network,Artificial intelligence,Natural language processing,Deep learning,Machine learning |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1703.08705 | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.41 | 29 | 11 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Gehrmann | 1 | 84 | 10.58 |
| Franck Dernoncourt | 2 | 149 | 35.39 |
| Yeran Li | 3 | 5 | 0.41 |
| Carlson, E. | 4 | 6 | 1.10 |
| Joy T. Wu | 5 | 5 | 1.42 |
| Jonathan Welt | 6 | 5 | 0.41 |
| John Foote Jr. | 7 | 5 | 0.41 |
| edward t moseley | 8 | 6 | 1.81 |
| David W. Grant | 9 | 5 | 0.75 |
| Patrick D. Tyler | 10 | 5 | 1.42 |
| Leo Anthony Celi | 11 | 53 | 12.79 |