Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The layout of a space station should be designed in such a way that different equipment and instruments are placed for the station as a whole to achieve the best overall performance. The station layout design is a typical nondeterministic polynomial problem. In particular, how to manage the design complexity to achieve an acceptable solution within a reasonable timeframe poses a great challenge. In this article, a new evolutionary algorithm has been proposed to meet such a challenge. It is called as the expert-guided evolutionary algorithm with a tree-like structure decomposition EGEA-TSD. Two innovations in EGEA-TSD are i to deal with the design complexity, the entire design space is divided into subspaces with a tree-like structure; it reduces the computation and facilitates experts’ involvement in the solving process. ii A human–intervention interface is developed to allow experts’ involvement in avoiding local optimums and accelerating convergence. To validate the proposed algorithm, the layout design of one-space station is formulated as a multi-disciplinary design problem, the developed algorithm is programmed and executed, and the result is compared with those from other two algorithms; it has illustrated the superior performance of the proposed EGEA-TSD. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1080/17517575.2016.1150521 | Enterprise IS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Industrial informatics,multidisciplinary design optimisation,expert-guided evolutionary algorithms (EGEA),space station design | Convergence (routing),Design space,Mathematical optimization,Page layout,Systems engineering,Evolutionary algorithm,Computer science,Linear subspace,Complex space,NP,Computation | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
11 | 7 | 1751-7575 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
2 | 0.37 | 24 |
Authors | ||
7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zhiqin Qian | 1 | 2 | 2.06 |
Zhuming Bi | 2 | 495 | 31.53 |
Qun Cao | 3 | 2 | 0.37 |
Weiguo Ju | 4 | 2 | 0.37 |
Hongfei Teng | 5 | 3 | 1.39 |
yang zheng | 6 | 35 | 8.53 |
Siyu Zheng | 7 | 2 | 0.37 |