Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
We explore the effects of providing task context when evaluating visualization tools using crowdsourcing. We gave crowdsource workers i) abstract information visualization tasks without any context, ii) tasks where we added semantics to the dataset, and iii) tasks with two types of backstory narratives: an analytic narrative and a decision-making narrative. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find evidence that adding data semantics increases accuracy, and further found that our backstory narratives can even decrease accuracy. Adding dataset semantics can however increase attention and provide subjective benefits in terms of confidence, perceived easiness, task enjoyability and perceived usefulness of the visualization. Nevertheless, our backstory narratives did not appear to provide additional subjective benefits. These preliminary findings suggest that narratives may have complex and unanticipated effects, calling for more studies in this area. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1145/3025453.3025870 | CHI |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
crowdsourcing, evaluation, instructions, narrative, information visualization, decision making | World Wide Web,Information visualization,Visualization,Computer science,Crowdsourcing,Crowdsource,Narrative,Human–computer interaction,Data semantics,Multimedia,Semantics,SWORD | Conference |
Citations | PageRank | References |
5 | 0.39 | 29 |
Authors | ||
3 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evanthia Dimara | 1 | 54 | 6.68 |
| Anastasia Bezerianos | 2 | 674 | 37.75 |
| Pierre Dragicevic | 3 | 1639 | 73.69 |