Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
During the 1980s Michie defined Machine Learning in terms of two orthogonal axes of performance: predictive accuracy and comprehensibility of generated hypotheses. Since predictive accuracy was readily measurable and comprehensibility not so, later definitions in the 1990s, such as that of Mitchell, tended to use a one-dimensional approach to Machine Learning based solely on predictive accuracy, ultimately favouring statistical over symbolic Machine Learning approaches. In this paper we provide a definition of comprehensibility of hypotheses which can be estimated using human participant trials. We present the results of experiments testing human comprehensibility of logic programs learned with and without predicate invention. Results indicate that comprehensibility is affected not only by the complexity of the presented program but also by the existence of anonymous predicate symbols. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2016 | ILP | Computer science,Natural language processing,Artificial intelligence,Predicate (grammar),Machine learning |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Conference | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ute Schmid | 1 | 224 | 44.20 |
| Christina Zeller | 2 | 6 | 0.79 |
| Tarek Richard Besold | 3 | 73 | 13.18 |
| Alireza Tamaddoni-Nezhad | 4 | 269 | 18.66 |
| Stephen Muggleton | 5 | 3915 | 619.54 |