Title
Making Sense of Conflicting Science Information: Exploring Bias in the Search Engine Result Page.
Abstract
Currently, there is widespread media coverage about the problems with 'fake news' that appears in social media, but the effects of biased information that appears in search engine results is also increasing. The authors argue that the search engine results page (SERP) exposes three important types of bias: source bias, algorithmic bias, and cognitive bias. To explore the relationship between these three types of bias, we conducted a mixed methods study with sixty participants (plus fourteen in a pilot to make a total of seventy-four participants). Within a library setting, participants were provided with mock search engine pages that presented order-controlled sources on a science controversy. Participants were then asked to rank the sources' usefulness and then summarize the controversy. We found that participants ranked the usefulness of sources depending on its presentation within a SERP. In turn, this also influenced how the participants summarized the topic. We attribute the differences in the participants' writings to the cognitive biases that affect a user's judgment when selecting sources on a SERP. We identify four main cognitive biases that a SERP can evoke in students: Priming, Anchoring, Framing, and the Availability Heuristic. While policing information quality is a quixotic task, changes can be made to both SERPs and a user's decision-making when selecting sources. As bias emerges both on the system side and the user side of search, we suggest a two-fold solution is required to address these challenges.
Year
DOI
Venue
2017
10.1145/3020165.3020185
CHIIR
Field
DocType
Citations 
Cognitive bias,Data mining,Social media,Search engine results page,Information retrieval,Ranking,Computer science,Priming (psychology),Heuristics,Information quality,Availability heuristic
Conference
6
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.63
20
2
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Alamir Novin161.98
Eric M. Meyers2638.95