Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Partial-autonomous vehicles are among us and represent a prominent testing ground for assessing the human interaction with autonomous vehicles. One main limitation of the studies investigating would-be users' attitude toward partial to full autonomous driving stems from their indirect experience with such technology. In this study, participants drove a partial-autonomous vehicle on the open road and interacted with both Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and Lane Keeping Assist (LKAS) systems. Preliminary results show participants rating level-2 autonomous features as possible sources of stress. Participants had issues engaging these systems with denser traffic and thought these systems to be more beneficial in traffic-free driving. Compared to ACC, engaging LKAS and monitoring its functioning represented a more challenging task and participants' ratings of stress toward this system increased over time. Findings obtained in this study are of importance for exploring user interaction with future highly-autonomous vehicles and designing effective countermeasures to make the human-machine interface of these systems more informative and easier to use. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1007/978-3-319-58475-1_25 | Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Autonomous vehicles,Trust,Acceptance,Partially autonomous,Highly autonomous,Human-machine interface | Countermeasure,Cruise control,Computer science,Human interaction,Human–computer interaction,Human–machine interface | Conference |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
10276 | 0302-9743 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.35 | 3 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Francesco Biondi | 1 | 1 | 0.69 |
| Rachel Goethe | 2 | 1 | 0.35 |
| Joel M. Cooper | 3 | 72 | 10.06 |
| David L. Strayer | 4 | 1 | 0.35 |