Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The objective of this study was to estimate poppy plant height and capsule volume with remote sensing using an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS). Data were obtained from field measurements and UAS flights over two poppy crops at Cambridge and Cressy in Tasmania. Imagery acquired from the UAS was used to produce dense point clouds using structure from motion (SfM) and multi-view stereopsis (MVS) techniques. Dense point clouds were used to generate a digital surface model (DSM) and orthophoto mosaic. An RGB index was derived from the orthophoto to extract the bare ground spaces. This bare ground space mask was used to filter the points on the ground, and a digital terrain model (DTM) was interpolated from these points. Plant height values were estimated by subtracting the DSM and DTM to generate a Crop Height Model (CHM). UAS-derived plant height (PH) and field measured PH in Cambridge were strongly correlated with R-2 values ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 for Transect 1 and Transect 2, respectively, while at Cressy results from a single flight provided R-2 of 0.97. Therefore, the proposed method can be considered an important step towards crop surface model (CSM) generation from a single UAS flight in situations where a bare ground DTM is unavailable. High correlations were found between UAS-derived PH and poppy capsule volume (CV) at capsule formation stage (R-2 0.74), with relative error of 19.62%. Results illustrate that plant height can be reliably estimated for poppy crops based on a single UAS flight and can be used to predict opium capsule volume at capsule formation stage. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.3390/rs9070647 | REMOTE SENSING |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
poppy,capsule volume,crop surfacemodel (CSM),UAS,crop height,precision agriculture | Structure from motion,Poppy,Remote sensing,Digital elevation model,Precision agriculture,Ranging,Point cloud,Geology,Approximation error,Orthophoto | Journal |
Volume | Issue | Citations |
9 | 7 | 5 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.53 | 12 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Faheem Iqbal | 1 | 6 | 0.88 |
| Arko Lucieer | 2 | 455 | 46.51 |
| Karen Barry | 3 | 6 | 0.88 |
| Reuben Wells | 4 | 5 | 0.53 |