Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper we attempt to shed light on the concept of an agent’s knowledge after a non-deterministic action is executed. We start by making a comparison between notions of non-deterministic choice, and between notions of sequential composition, of settings with dynamic and/or epistemic character; namely Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL), Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL), and the more recent logic of Semi-Public Environments (SPE). These logics represent two different approaches for defining the aforementioned actions, and in order to provide unified frameworks that encompass both, we define the logics DELVO (DEL+Vision+Ontic change) and PDLVE (PDL+Vision+Epistemic operators). DELVO is given a sound and complete axiomatisation. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.24963/ijcai.2017/146 | IJCAI |
Field | DocType | Citations |
Belief change,Determinism,Cognitive science,Computer science,Dynamic epistemic logic,Operator (computer programming),Artificial intelligence,Dynamic logic (digital electronics),Ontic,Machine learning | Conference | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 6 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Davide Grossi | 1 | 423 | 41.79 |
Andreas Herzig | 2 | 655 | 48.55 |
Wiebe Van Der Hoek | 3 | 2566 | 195.77 |
Christos Moyzes | 4 | 3 | 2.45 |