Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
We consider the problem of maximizing the spread of influence in a social network by choosing a fixed number of initial seeds, formally referred to as the influence maximization problem. It admits a (1−1/e)-factor approximation algorithm if the influence function is submodular. Otherwise, in the worst case, the problem is NP-hard to approximate to within a factor of N1−&varepsilon. This article studies whether this worst-case hardness result can be circumvented by making assumptions about either the underlying network topology or the cascade model. All our assumptions are motivated by many real-life social network cascades.
First, we present strong inapproximability results for a very restricted class of networks called the (stochastic) hierarchical blockmodel, a special case of the well-studied (stochastic) blockmodel in which relationships between blocks admit a tree structure. We also provide a dynamic-programming-based polynomial time algorithm, which optimally computes a directed variant of the influence maximization problem on hierarchical blockmodel networks. Our algorithm indicates that the inapproximability result is due to the bidirectionality of influence between agent-blocks.
Second, we present strong inapproximability results for a class of influence functions that are “almost” submodular, called 2-quasi-submodular. Our inapproximability results hold even for any 2-quasi-submodular f fixed in advance. This result also indicates that the “threshold” between submodularity and nonsubmodularity is sharp, regarding the approximability of influence maximization.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1145/3313904 | WINE |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
(non)submodular optimization, Influence maximization, approximability | Journal | abs/1710.02827 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
3 | ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (April 2019) | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 15 | 2 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Grant Schoenebeck | 1 | 509 | 39.48 |
Biaoshuai Tao | 2 | 26 | 4.69 |