Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Litotes, often confused with meiosis and understatement, has long suffered neglect. By comparing synonymous key words in previous definitions, this essay defines litotes as "a trope in which an affirmative is expressed by the negation of its opposite," and for the first time classifies litotes into three subtypes based upon Aristotle's study of opposition: contradictory, contrary and relative. Focusing particularly on the strong contradictory type of litotes and its realization in The Analects of Confucius, with its nearly one hundred double negation litotes, we find they prominently serve the logical functions of achieving high probability, providing a sophisticated major premise, and elaborating strict definitions. Further, the essay argues that this strong argumentative function in logic leads to litotes' epistemic power, a promising dimension for future research. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.3233/AAC-170029 | ARGUMENT & COMPUTATION |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Rhetorical figures, tropes, logic, epistemic rhetoric, negation | Litotes,Argumentative,Natural language processing,Artificial intelligence,Linguistics,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
8 | 3 | 1946-2166 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
1 | ||