Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Web browsing services are expanding as smartphones are becoming increasingly popular worldwide. To provide customers with appropriate quality of web-browsing services, quality design and in-service quality management on the basis of quality of experience (QoE) is important. We propose a web-browsing QoE estimation model. The most important QoE factor for web-browsing is the waiting time for a web page to load. Next, the variation in the communication quality based on a mobile network should be considered. We developed a subjective quality assessment test to clarify QoE characteristics in terms of waiting time using 20 different types of web pages and constructed a web-page QoE estimation model. We then conducted a subjective quality assessment test of web-browsing to clarify the relationship between web-page QoE and web-browsing QoE for three web sites. We obtained the following two QoE characteristics. First, the main factor influencing web-browsing QoE is the average web-page QoE. Second, when web-page QoE variation occurs, a decrease in web-page QoE with a huge amplitude causes the web-browsing QoE to decrease. We used these characteristics in constructing our web-browsing QoE estimation model. The verification test results using non-training data indicate the accuracy of the model. We also show that our findings are applicable to web-browsing quality design and solving management issues on the basis of QoE. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1587/transcom.2016EBP3411 | IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
QoE, waiting time, web page, web browsing, subjective quality assessment test, estimation model | World Wide Web,Web page,Computer science,Web navigation,Multimedia | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
E100B | 10 | 0916-8516 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.41 | 8 |
Authors | ||
6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Toshiko Tominaga | 1 | 1 | 0.41 |
Kanako Sato | 2 | 1 | 0.41 |
Noriko Yoshimura | 3 | 1 | 0.41 |
Masataka Masuda | 4 | 1 | 0.41 |
Hitoshi Aoki | 5 | 2 | 0.85 |
Takanori Hayashi | 6 | 149 | 21.87 |