Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
Compatible, energy conserving, bounds preserving remap of hydrodynamic fields for an extended ALE scheme. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
From the very origins of numerical hydrodynamics in the Lagrangian work of von Neumann and Richtmyer [83], the issue of total energy conservation as well as entropy production has been problematic. Because of well known problems with mesh deformation, Lagrangian schemes have evolved into Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) methods [39] that combine the best properties of Lagrangian and Eulerian methods. Energy issues have persisted for this class of methods. We believe that fundamental issues of energy conservation and entropy production in ALE require further examination. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.11.017 | Journal of Computational Physics |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
ALE,Remap,Reconstruction,Bounds-preserving,Energy-conserving | Applied mathematics,Topology,Energy conservation,Nonlinear system,Polynomial,Mathematical analysis,Scalar (physics),Tensor field,Entropy production,Eulerian path,Momentum,Mathematics | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
355 | C | 0021-9991 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
4 | 0.46 | 16 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donald E. Burton | 1 | 52 | 5.40 |
| Nathaniel R. Morgan | 2 | 52 | 7.68 |
| Marc R. Charest | 3 | 9 | 0.93 |
| Mark A. Kenamond | 4 | 35 | 2.56 |
| J. Fung | 5 | 4 | 0.46 |