Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
One of the benefits when network operators adopt the Software Defined Networking (SDN) paradigm is the ability to monitor the traffic in the network without an additional network management system. Usually, SDN controllers utilize OpenFlow statistics messages in order to regularly gather information about all flows in the network. However, using the same polling interval for all flows does not take into account the heterogeneity of real world traffic and thus results in an imbalance between monitoring accuracy and control plane overhead. In particular, frequent querying results in a high resource consumption at the controller. This work proposes a Selective Flow Monitoring (SFM) mechanism that allows administrators to classify flows according to their individual requirements in terms of monitoring frequency, e.g., less frequent polling of elephant flows and frequent polling of QoS sensitive VoIP connections. We compare the performance of the SFM mechanism with the default monitoring scheme in a testbed featuring the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) controller. In this context, the CPU utilization of the controller is used as performance indicator. After identifying relevant influence factors like the number of flows and switches in the network, we investigate the viability of the approaches in different scenarios. Finally, we provide guidelines regarding their choice. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2017 | 10.23919/CNSM.2017.8256058 | 2017 13th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
SDN,Flow Monitoring,OpenFlow | Control theory,Computer science,Testbed,Network operating system,Computer network,Quality of service,Polling,OpenFlow,Network monitoring,Software-defined networking,Distributed computing | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
2165-9605 | 978-1-5386-2153-0 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 6 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anh Nguyen-Ngoc | 1 | 35 | 3.08 |
| Stanislav Lange | 2 | 132 | 12.28 |
| Thomas Zinner | 3 | 793 | 60.34 |
| Michael Seufert | 4 | 620 | 51.18 |
| P. Tran-Gia | 5 | 93 | 22.85 |
| Nieke Aerts | 6 | 3 | 0.75 |
| David Hock | 7 | 111 | 6.43 |