Name
Title | ||
|---|---|---|
A design of experiment aided stochastic parameterization method for modeling aquifer NAPL contamination. |
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Numerical models have been widely applied in simulating subsurface Non-aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL) contamination processes. In order to examine modeling uncertainties and improve simulation performance, a new hybrid stochastic - design of experiment (DOE) aided parameterization method was developed by using a coupled experimental and modeling approach. In a case study, an existing commercial groundwater modeling tool BioF&T 3D was applied to conduct numerical simulations of subsurface contamination processes based on flow cell experiments. Parameterization results indicated that porosity, distribution coefficient, and Henry's constant were the most significant parameters. The result also revealed their interactions. The DOE predicted responses were found reasonably close to the actual ones from the models' simulations. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to conduct uncertainty analysis within the narrowed parameters ranges, which were generated by centralizing the DOE optimized values, and the combinations of parameters were further updated when better responses were found. After parameterization, R2 valued 0.80, 0.91, 0.89, and 0.90 for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), respectively. A good consistency (R2 = 0.76 to 0.90 for BTEX) was also achieved during the model verification, which confirmed that after the parameterization processes, the simulation model can potentially be used for predictions under similar conditions. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.014 | Environmental Modelling & Software |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Design of experiment,Stochastic,Parameterization,Subsurface NAPL contamination,Uncertainty | Soil science,Monte Carlo method,Parametrization,Computer science,Hydrology,BTEX,Groundwater model,Flow (psychology),Uncertainty analysis,Aquifer,Design of experiments | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
101 | 1364-8152 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 5 | 5 |