Paper Info
Title
Experience of industry case studies: a comparison of multi-case and embedded case study methods.
Abstract
Context: Case studies are a useful approach for conducting empirical studies of software engineering, in part because they allow a phenomenon to be studied in its real-world context. However, given that there are several kinds of case studies, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, researchers need to know how to choose which kind to employ for a specific research study. Aim: The objective of this research is to compare two case study approaches: embedded, longitudinal case studies, and multi-case studies. Approach: We compared two actual software engineering case studies: a multi-case study involving interviews with 46 practitioners at 9 international companies engaged in offshoring and outsourcing, and a single case, participant observation embedded case study lasting 13 months in a mid-sized Irish software company. Both case studies were exploring similar problems of understanding the activities performed by members of scrum development teams. Results: We found that both multi-case and embedded case studies are suitable for exploratory research (hypothesis development) but that embedded research may also be more suitable for explanatory research (hypothesis testing). We also found that longitudinal case studies offer better confirmability, while multi-case studies offer better transferability. Conclusion: We propose a set of illustrative research questions to assist with the selection of the appropriate case study method.
Year
DOI
Venue
2018
10.1145/3193965.3193967
CESI@ICSE
Keywords
Field
DocType
Case Study Methods, Empirical Studies in Industry, Multi-case Study, Embedded Case Study, Cross-case Analysis
Scrum,Participant observation,Knowledge management,Outsourcing,Case method,Need to know,Engineering,Strengths and weaknesses,Exploratory research,Management science,Empirical research
Conference
ISSN
ISBN
Citations 
2575-4785
978-1-4503-5736-4
0
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.34
14
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Julian M. Bass114322.88
Sarah Beecham229022.70
John Noll342237.80