Title
Detecting and (Not) Dealing with Plagiarism in an Engineering Paper: Beyond CrossCheck—A Case Study
Abstract
In papers in areas such as engineering and the physical sciences, figures, tables and formulae are the basic elements to communicate the authors’ core ideas, workings and results. As a computational text-matching tool, CrossCheck cannot work on these non-textual elements to detect plagiarism. Consequently, when comparing engineering or physical sciences papers, CrossCheck may return a low similarity index even when plagiarism has in fact taken place. A case of demonstrated plagiarism involving engineering papers with a low similarity index is discussed, and editor’s experiences and suggestions are given on how to tackle this problem. The case shows a lack of understanding of plagiarism by some authors or editors, and illustrates the difficulty of getting some editors and publishers to take appropriate action. Consequently, authors, journal editors, and reviewers, as well as research institutions all are duty-bound not only to recognize the differences between ethical and unethical behavior in order to protect a healthy research environment, and also to maintain consistent ethical publishing standards.
Year
DOI
Venue
2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9460-5
Science and Engineering Ethics
Keywords
DocType
Volume
Plagiarism,Engineering and physical sciences,CrossCheck,Journal editors
Journal
20
Issue
ISSN
Citations 
2
1353-3452
2
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.68
9
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Xin-xin Zhang120.68
Zhao-lin Huo220.68
Yuehong Zhang331.76