Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
While current deep learning systems excel at tasks such as object classification, language processing, and gameplay, few can construct or modify a complex system such as a tower of blocks. We hypothesize that what these systems lack is a "relational inductive bias": a capacity for reasoning about inter-object relations and making choices over a structured description of a scene. To test this hypothesis, we focus on a task that involves gluing pairs of blocks together to stabilize a tower, and quantify how well humans perform. We then introduce a deep reinforcement learning agent which uses object- and relation-centric scene and policy representations and apply it to the task. Our results show that these structured representations allow the agent to outperform both humans and more naive approaches, suggesting that relational inductive bias is an important component in solving structured reasoning problems and for building more intelligent, flexible machines. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2018 | CogSci | Inductive bias,Tower,Artificial intelligence,Deep learning,Machine learning,Mathematics,Reinforcement learning |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1806.01203 | 7 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.42 | 21 | 7 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica B. Hamrick | 1 | 66 | 9.25 |
| Kelsey Allen | 2 | 102 | 7.30 |
| Victor Bapst | 3 | 143 | 5.38 |
| Tina Zhu | 4 | 13 | 1.56 |
| Kevin R. McKee | 5 | 13 | 3.59 |
| Joshua B. Tenenbaum | 6 | 4445 | 437.33 |
| Peter Battaglia | 7 | 442 | 22.63 |