Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Deep models are subject to performance drop when encountering appearance discrepancy, even on congeneric corpus in which objects share the similar structure but only differ slightly in appearance. This performance drop can be observed in automated ultrasound image segmentation. In this paper, we try to address this general problem with a novel online adversarial appearance conversion solution. Our contribution is three-fold. First, different from previous methods which utilize corpus-level training to model a fixed source-target appearance conversion in advance, we only need to model the source corpus and then we can efficiently convert each single testing image in the target corpus on-the-fly. Second, we propose a self-play training strategy to effectively pre-train all the adversarial modules in our framework to capture the appearance and structure distributions of source corpus. Third, we propose to explore a composite appearance and structure constraints distilled from the source corpus to stabilize the online adversarial appearance conversion, thus the pre-trained models can iteratively remove appearance discrepancy in the testing image in a weakly-supervised fashion. We demonstrate our method on segmenting congeneric prenatal ultrasound images. Based on the appearance conversion, we can generalize deep models at-hand well and achieve significant improvement in segmentation without re-training on massive, expensive new annotations. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_57 | Lecture Notes in Computer Science |
Field | DocType | Volume |
Computer vision,Market segmentation,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Generalization,Segmentation,Ultrasound image segmentation,Artificial intelligence | Conference | 11073 |
ISSN | Citations | PageRank |
0302-9743 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
5 | 8 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xin Yang | 1 | 175 | 12.96 |
| Haoran Dou | 2 | 27 | 4.12 |
| ran li | 3 | 28 | 4.97 |
| Xu Wang | 4 | 103 | 15.76 |
| Cheng Bian | 5 | 26 | 4.00 |
| Shengli Li | 6 | 184 | 18.06 |
| Dong Ni | 7 | 367 | 37.37 |
| Pheng-Ann Heng | 8 | 3565 | 280.98 |