Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The academic research performance is often quantitatively measured by means of using citation frequency. The citation frequency-based indicators, such as h-index and impact factor, are commonly used reflecting the citation quality to some extent. However, these frequency-based indicators are usually carried out based on the assumption that all citations are equal. This may lead to biased evaluations in that, the attributes of the citing objects and cited objects are significant. A high-accuracy evaluation method is needed. In this paper, we review various citation quality-based evaluation indicators, and categorize them considering the algorithms being applied. We discuss the pros and cons of these indicators, and compare them from four dimensions. The outcomes will be useful for our further research on distinguishing citation quality. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.3745/JIPS.04.0080 | JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
Academic Evaluation Indicators, Citation Analysis, Citation Impact, Citation Quality | Journal | 14 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
4 | 1976-913X | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mingyue Zhang | 1 | 4 | 4.14 |
| Jin Shi | 2 | 24 | 6.28 |
| jin wang | 3 | 243 | 36.79 |
| Chang Liu | 4 | 159 | 52.61 |