Title | ||
---|---|---|
Understanding the Acceleration Phenomenon via High-Resolution Differential Equations. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Gradient-based optimization algorithms can be studied from the perspective of limiting ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Motivated by the fact that existing ODEs do not distinguish between two fundamentally different algorithms---Nesterovu0027s accelerated method for strongly convex functions (NAG-SC) and Polyaku0027s heavy-ball method---we study an alternative limiting process that yields high-resolution ODEs. We show that these ODEs permit a general Lyapunov function framework for the analysis of convergence in both continuous and discrete time. We also show that these ODEs are more accurate surrogates for the underlying algorithms; in particular, they not only distinguish between NAG-SC and Polyaku0027s heavy-ball method, but they allow the identification of a term that we refer to as gradient correction that is present in NAG-SC but not in the heavy-ball method and is responsible for the qualitative difference in convergence of the two methods. We also use the high-resolution ODE framework to study Nesterovu0027s accelerated method for (non-strongly) convex functions, uncovering a hitherto unknown result---that NAG-C minimizes the squared norm at an inverse cubic rate. Finally, by modifying the high-resolution ODE of NAG-C, we obtain a family of new optimization methods that are shown to maintain the accelerated convergence rates of NAG-C for smooth convex functions. |
Year | Venue | Field |
---|---|---|
2018 | arXiv: Optimization and Control | Convergence (routing),Gradient method,Lyapunov function,Differential equation,Applied mathematics,Mathematical optimization,Ordinary differential equation,Convex function,Discrete time and continuous time,Ode,Mathematics |
DocType | Volume | Citations |
Journal | abs/1810.08907 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.35 | 17 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Bin Shi | 1 | 2 | 1.37 |
Simon Du | 2 | 210 | 29.79 |
Michael I. Jordan | 3 | 31220 | 3640.80 |
Weijie Su | 4 | 86 | 11.84 |