Title | ||
---|---|---|
Benchmarking the SHL Recognition Challenge with Classical and Deep-Learning Pipelines. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper we, as part of the Sussex-Huawei Locomotion-Transportation (SHL) Recognition Challenge organizing team, present reference recognition performance obtained by applying various classical and deep-learning classifiers to the testing dataset. We aim to recognize eight modes of transportation (Still, Walk, Run, Bike, Bus, Car, Train, Subway) from smartphone inertial sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer. The classical classifiers include naive Bayesian, decision tree, random forest, K-nearest neighbour and support vector machine, while the deep-learning classifiers include fully-connected and convolutional deep neural networks. We feed different types of input to the classifier, including hand-crafted features, raw sensor data in the time domain, and in the frequency domain. We employ a post-processing scheme to improve the recognition performance. Results show that convolutional neural network operating on frequency-domain raw data achieves the best performance among all the classifiers.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1145/3267305.3267531 | UbiComp '18: The 2018 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing
Singapore
Singapore
October, 2018 |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Activity recognition, Dataset, Deep learning, Machine learning, Transportation mode recognition | Decision tree,Activity recognition,Naive Bayes classifier,Computer science,Convolutional neural network,Support vector machine,Human–computer interaction,Artificial intelligence,Deep learning,Classifier (linguistics),Random forest,Machine learning | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4503-5966-5 | 1 | 0.39 |
References | Authors | |
8 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Lin Wang | 1 | 177 | 15.50 |
Hristijan Gjoreski | 2 | 268 | 29.81 |
Mathias Ciliberto | 3 | 33 | 6.12 |
Sami Mekki | 4 | 1 | 0.72 |
Stefan Valentin | 5 | 130 | 14.09 |
Daniel Roggen | 6 | 1851 | 137.05 |