Title | ||
---|---|---|
Physical modeling of bitcell stability in subthreshold SRAMs for leakage-area optimization under PVT variations |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Subthreshold SRAM design is crucial for addressing the memory bottleneck in energy constrained applications. While statistical optimization can be applied based on Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation, exploration of bitcell design space is time consuming. This paper presents a framework for model-based design and optimization of subthreshold SRAM bitcells under random PVT variations. By incorporating key design and process features, a physical model of bitcell static noise margin (SNM) has been derived analytically. It captures intra-die SNM variations by the combination of a folded-normal distribution and a non-central chi-squared distribution. Validations with MC simulation show its accuracy of modeling SNM distributions down to 25mV beyond 6-sigma for typical bitcells in 28nm. Model-based tuning of subthreshold SRAM bitcells is investigated for design tradeoff between leakage, area and stability. When targeting a specific SNM constraint, we show that an optimal standby voltage exists which offers minimum bitcell leakage power - any deviation above or below increases the power consumption. When targeting a specific standby voltage, our design flow identifies bitcell instances of 12x less leakage power or 3x reductions in area as compared to the minimum-length design.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1145/3240765.3240836 | ICCAD-IEEE ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
SRAM,Static noise margin,Random process variations | Bottleneck,Static noise margin,Leakage (electronics),Computer science,Voltage,Static random-access memory,Electronic engineering,Design flow,Subthreshold conduction,Transistor | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
1933-7760 | 978-1-4503-5950-4 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 23 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xin Fan | 1 | 776 | 104.55 |
Rui Wang | 2 | 139 | 53.65 |
Tobias Gemmeke | 3 | 49 | 6.49 |