Title | ||
---|---|---|
Accounting for Non-Gaussian Sources of Spatial Correlation in Parametric Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms I: Revisiting Cluster-Based Inferences. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In a recent study, Eklund et al. employed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data as a surrogate for null functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) datasets and posited that cluster-wise family-wise error (FWE) rate-corrected inferences made by using parametric statistical methods in fMRI studies over the past two decades may have been invalid, particularly for cluster defining thresholds less stringent than p < 0.001; this was principally because the spatial autocorrelation functions (sACF) of fMRI data had been modeled incorrectly to follow a Gaussian form, whereas empirical data suggested otherwise. Here, we show that accounting for non-Gaussian signal components such as those arising from resting-state neural activity as well as physiological responses and motion artifacts in the null fMRI datasets yields first-and second-level general linear model analysis residuals with nearly uniform and Gaussian sACF. Further comparison with nonparametric permutation tests indicates that cluster-based FWE corrected inferences made with Gaussian spatial noise approximations are valid. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1089/brain.2017.0521 | BRAIN CONNECTIVITY |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
cluster-based family-wise error rate calculation,fMRI parametric methods,general linear model residuals,Monte Carlo simulation,principal component analysis,spatial autocorrelation function,thresholding | Spatial analysis,Accounting,Spatial correlation,Functional magnetic resonance imaging,General linear model,Nonparametric statistics,Parametric statistics,Gaussian,Medicine,Principal component analysis | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
8 | 1 | 2158-0014 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 11 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Kaundinya Gopinath | 1 | 37 | 5.29 |
Venkatagiri Krishnamurthy | 2 | 1 | 1.04 |
K Sathian | 3 | 154 | 12.56 |