Title | ||
---|---|---|
Change Detection in Coral Reef Environment Using High-Resolution Images: Comparison of Object-Based and Pixel-Based Paradigms. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Despite increases in the spatial resolution of satellite imagery prompting interest in object-based image analysis, few studies have used object-based methods for monitoring changes in coral reefs. This study proposes a high accuracy object-based change detection (OBCD) method intended for coral reef environment, which uses QuickBird and WorldView-2 images. The proposed methodological framework includes image fusion, multi-temporal image segmentation, image differencing, random forests models, and object-area-based accuracy assessment. For validation, we applied the method to images of four coral reef study sites in the South China Sea. We compared the proposed OBCD method with a conventional pixel-based change detection (PBCD) method by implementing both methods under the same conditions. The average overall accuracy of OBCD exceeded 90%, which was approximately 20% higher than PBCD. The OBCD method was free from salt-and-pepper effects and was less prone to images misregistration in terms of change detection accuracy and mapping results. The object-area-based accuracy assessment reached a higher overall accuracy and per-class accuracy than the object-number-based and pixel-number-based accuracy assessment. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.3390/ijgi7110441 | ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
coral reef,change detection,very high resolution,object-based method,random forests | Satellite imagery,Change detection,Image fusion,Computer science,Remote sensing,Image differencing,Image segmentation,Pixel,Random forest,Image resolution | Journal |
Volume | Issue | Citations |
7 | 11 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 14 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zhenjin Zhou | 1 | 16 | 1.10 |
Lei Ma | 2 | 33 | 5.90 |
Tengyu Fu | 3 | 16 | 1.10 |
Ge Zhang | 4 | 0 | 0.34 |
Mengru Yao | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |
Manchun Li | 6 | 211 | 45.40 |