Title
Differentially Private Fair Learning.
Abstract
Motivated by settings in which predictive models may be required to be non-discriminatory with respect to certain attributes (such as race), but even collecting the sensitive attribute may be forbidden or restricted, we initiate the study of fair learning under the constraint of differential privacy. We design two learning algorithms that simultaneously promise differential privacy and equalized odds, a u0027fairnessu0027 condition that corresponds to equalizing false positive and negative rates across protected groups. Our first algorithm is a private implementation of the equalized odds post-processing approach of [Hardt et al., 2016]. This algorithm is appealingly simple, but must be able to use protected group membership explicitly at test time, which can be viewed as a form of u0027disparate treatmentu0027. Our second algorithm is a differentially private version of the oracle-efficient in-processing approach of [Agarwal et al., 2018] that can be used to find the optimal fair classifier, given access to a subroutine that can solve the original (not necessarily fair) learning problem. This algorithm is more complex but need not have access to protected group membership at test time. We identify new tradeoffs between fairness, accuracy, and privacy that emerge only when requiring all three properties, and show that these tradeoffs can be milder if group membership may be used at test time. We conclude with a brief experimental evaluation.
Year
Venue
Field
2018
international conference on machine learning
Differential privacy,Subroutine,Theoretical computer science,Artificial intelligence,Disparate treatment,Odds,Classifier (linguistics),Machine learning,Mathematics
DocType
Volume
Citations 
Journal
abs/1812.02696
1
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.36
10
7
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Matthew Jagielski1475.62
Michael J. Kearns259041805.52
Jieming Mao3549.19
Alina Oprea4106756.47
Aaron Roth51937110.48
Saeed Sharifi -Malvajerdi613.74
Jonathan Ullman748540.07