Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
: In this paper we argue that substitution-based function allocation methods (such as MABA-MABA, or Men-Are-Better-At/Machines-Are-Better-At
lists) cannot provide progress on human–automation co-ordination. Quantitative ‘who does what’ allocation does not work because
the real effects of automation are qualitative: it transforms human practice and forces people to adapt their skills and routines.
Rather than re-inventing or refining substitution-based methods, we propose that the more pressing question on human–automation
co-ordination is ‘How do we make them get along together?’ |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2002 | 10.1007/s101110200022 | Cognition, Technology & Work |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Key words: Automation – Cognition – Computers – Co-ordination – Function allocation – Human error | Simulation,Ordination,Knowledge management,Automation,Function allocation,Engineering,Accident prevention | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
4 | 4 | 1435-5558 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
41 | 3.12 | 6 |
Authors | ||
2 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| S. W. A. Dekker | 1 | 96 | 12.07 |
| D. Woods | 2 | 1287 | 229.36 |