Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
With the rapid development of wireless communication, the spectrum resource becomes rare, and research on utilization of limited spectrum resource becomes more popular, especially in fifth generation (5G) mobile communication system. Some efficient frequency division multiplexing systems, such as spectrally efficient frequency division multiplexing (SEFDM) system, can improve spectrum utilization by further compression of the distance between subcarriers with respect to orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) carrier structure. This idea of further compressing bands will efficiently solve the problem of scarce spectrum resource in future. However, this kind of systems exist strong self-caused inter-carrier interference (ICI) due to non-orthogonal subcarriers employment, which poses a great challenge to the design of receiver. In this paper, a receiver designed with iterative ICI compensation (IIC) for SEFDM is proposed, which has excellent bit error rate (BER) performance and low complexity. Simulation results show that the BER performance of system under iterative ICI compensation receiver is almost same as traditional combining iterative detection and fixed sphere detection (ID-FSD) scheme with large bandwidth compression factor (BCF). But the complexity of the proposed method is lower than that of ID-FSD. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1186/s13638-018-1036-2 | EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Non-orthogonal subcarriers,ICI compensation,BER performance,Low complexity | Wireless,Computer science,Frequency-division multiplexing,Bandwidth compression,Real-time computing,Electronic engineering,Interference (wave propagation),Mobile communication systems,Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing,Bit error rate | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
2018 | 1 | 1687-1499 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 4 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Min Jia | 1 | 158 | 39.37 |
| Zhiying Wu | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Zhisheng Yin | 3 | 19 | 4.49 |
| Qing Guo | 4 | 83 | 22.55 |
| Xuemai Gu | 5 | 84 | 27.15 |