Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Modern machine learning algorithms for classification or regression such as gradient boosting, random forest and neural networks involve a number of parameters that have to be fixed before running them. Such parameters are commonly denoted as hyperparameters in machine learning, a terminology we also adopt here. term tuning parameter is also frequently used to denote parameters that should be carefully tuned, i.e. optimized with respect to performance. The users of these algorithms can use defaults of these hyperparameters that are specified in the employed software package, set them to alternative specific values or use a tuning strategy to choose them appropriately for the specific dataset at hand. In this context, we define tunability as the amount of performance gain that can be achieved by setting the considered hyperparameter to the best possible value instead of the default value. goal of this paper is two-fold. Firstly, we formalize the problem of tuning from a statistical point of view and suggest general measures quantifying the tunability of hyperparameters of algorithms. Secondly, we conduct a large-scale benchmarking study based on 38 datasets from the OpenML platform (Vanschoren et al., 2013) using six of the most common machine learning algorithms for classification and regression and apply our measures to assess the tunability of their parameters. results yield interesting insights into the investigated hyperparameters that in some cases allow general conclusions on their tunability. Our results may help users of the algorithms to decide whether it is worth to conduct a possibly time consuming tuning strategy, to focus on the most important hyperparameters and to chose adequate hyperparameter spaces for tuning. |
Year | Venue | Field |
|---|---|---|
2019 | Journal of Machine Learning Research | Hyperparameter,Regression,Terminology,Algorithm,Software,Artificial intelligence,Artificial neural network,Random forest,Benchmarking,Mathematics,Machine learning,Gradient boosting |
DocType | Citations | PageRank |
Journal | 3 | 0.43 |
References | Authors | |
9 | 3 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Philipp Probst | 1 | 4 | 1.15 |
| Bernd Bischl | 2 | 493 | 41.28 |
| Anne-Laure Boulesteix | 3 | 945 | 63.22 |