Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Resolution proof systems for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) provide a formal model for studying the limitations of state-of-the-art search-based QBF solvers that use these systems to generate proofs. We study a combination of two proof systems supported by the solver DepQBF: Q-resolution with generalized universal reduction according to a dependency scheme and long distance Q-resolution. We show that the resulting proof system—which we call long-distance Q(D)-resolution—is sound for the reflexive resolution-path dependency scheme. In fact, we prove that it admits strategy extraction in polynomial time. This comes as an application of a general result, by which we identify a whole class of dependency schemes for which long-distance Q(D)-resolution admits polynomial-time strategy extraction. As a special case, we obtain soundness and polynomial-time strategy extraction for long distance Q(D)-resolution with the standard dependency scheme. We further show that search-based QBF solvers using a dependency scheme D and learning with long-distance Q-resolution generate long-distance Q(D)-resolution proofs. The above soundness results thus translate to partial soundness results for such solvers: they declare an input QBF to be false only if it is indeed false. Finally, we report on experiments with a configuration of DepQBF that uses the standard dependency scheme and learning based on long-distance Q-resolution. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1007/s10817-018-9467-3 | Journal of Automated Reasoning |
Keywords | DocType | Volume |
QBF, Q-resolution, Dependency schemes, Strategy extraction | Journal | 63.0 |
Issue | ISSN | Citations |
1 | 1573-0670 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 21 | 3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Tomás Peitl | 1 | 6 | 4.82 |
Friedrich Slivovsky | 2 | 62 | 7.96 |
Stefan Szeider | 3 | 1341 | 99.97 |