Title | ||
---|---|---|
Computational Complexity of Outer-Independent Total and Total Roman Domination Numbers in Trees |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
An outer-independent total dominating set (OITDS) of a graph G is a set D of vertices of G such that every vertex of G has a neighbor in D, and the set V(G)\D is independent. The outer-independent total domination number of a graph G, denoted by gamma(oit)(G), is the minimum cardinality of an OITDS of G. An outer-independent total Roman dominating function (OITRDF) on a graph G is a function f : V(G) -> {0, 1, 2} satisfying the conditions that every vertex u with f(u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v with f(v) = 2, every vertex x with f(x) >= 1 is adjacent to at least one vertex y with f(y) >= 1, and any two different vertices a, b with f(a) = f(b) = 0 are not adjacent. The minimum weight omega(f) = Sigma(v is an element of V(G))f(v) of any OITRDF f for G is the outer-independent total Roman domination number of G, denoted by gamma(oitR)(G). A graph G is called an outer-independent total Roman graph (OIT-Roman graph) if gamma(oitR)(G) = 2 gamma(oit)(G). In this paper, we propose dynamic programming algorithms to compute the outer-independent total domination number and the outer-independent total Roman domination number of a tree, respectively. Moreover, we characterize all OIT-Roman graphs and give a linear time algorithm for recognizing an OIT-Roman graph. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2851972 | IEEE ACCESS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Outer-independent total domination,outer-independent total Roman domination,outer-independent total Roman graph,tree,algorithm | Dominating set,Combinatorics,Vertex (geometry),Computer science,Cardinality,Computer network,Omega,Minimum weight,Domination analysis,Time complexity,Computational complexity theory | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
6 | 2169-3536 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 4 | 5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Zepeng Li | 1 | 0 | 0.68 |
Zehui Shao | 2 | 119 | 30.98 |
Fangnian Lang | 3 | 1 | 1.04 |
Xiao-song Zhang | 4 | 305 | 45.10 |
Jia-Bao Liu | 5 | 110 | 21.86 |