Title | ||
---|---|---|
Multi-Objective Optimization and Characterization of Pareto Points for Scalable Coding |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In this paper, we formulated the optimal bit-allocation problem for a scalable codec for images/videos as a graph-based constrained vector-valued optimization problem with many optimal solutions, which are referred to as Pareto points. Pareto points are generally derived using weighted sum scalarization; however, it has yet to be determined whether all Pareto points can be derived using this approach. This paper addresses this issue. When presented as a theorem, our results indicate that as long as the rate-distortion function of each resolution is strictly decreasing and convex and the Pareto points form a continuous curve, then all Pareto points can be derived using scalarization. The theorem is verified using the state-of-the-art scalable coding method H.264/SVC and a scalability extension of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). We highlight a number of easily interpretable Pareto points that represent a good trade-off between candidate resolutions. The proximity point is defined as the Pareto point closest to the ideal performance for each resolution. We also model the Pareto points as a function of total bit rate and demonstrate that the Pareto points at other target bit rates can be predicted. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2851999 | IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Encoding,Distortion,Codecs,Resource management,Rate-distortion,Optimization,Scalability | Mathematical optimization,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Regular polygon,Coding (social sciences),Multi-objective optimization,Artificial intelligence,Optimization problem,Codec,Pareto principle,Scalability,Encoding (memory) | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
29 | 7 | 1051-8215 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 0 |
Authors | ||
3 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Wen-Liang Hwang | 1 | 429 | 58.03 |
Chia-Chen Lee | 2 | 0 | 0.34 |
Guan-Ju Peng | 3 | 11 | 3.27 |