Title | ||
---|---|---|
Robust High-Order Manifold Constrained Sparse Principal Component Analysis for Image Representation |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
In order to efficiently utilize the information in the data and eliminate the negative effects of outliers in the principal component analysis (PCA) method, in this paper, we propose a novel robust sparse PCA method based on maximum correntropy criterion (MCC) with high-order manifold constraints called the RHSPCA. Compared with the traditional PCA methods, the proposed RHSPCA has the following benefits: 1) the MCC regression term is more robust to outliers than the MSE-based regression term; 2) thanks to the high-order manifold constraints, the low-dimensional representations can preserve the local relations of the data and greatly improve the clustering and classification performance for image processing tasks; and 3) in order to further counteract the adverse effects of outliers, the MCC-based samples’ mean is proposed to better centralize the data. We also propose a new solver based on the half-quadratic technique and accelerated block coordinate update strategy to solve the RHSPCA model. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed method can outperform the state-of-the-art robust PCA methods on a variety of image processing tasks, including reconstruction, clustering, and classification, on outliers contaminated datasets. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2856827 | IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Principal component analysis,Robustness,Manifolds,Kernel,Image reconstruction,Task analysis | Kernel (linear algebra),Sparse PCA,Pattern recognition,Computer science,Outlier,Image processing,Robustness (computer science),Artificial intelligence,Solver,Cluster analysis,Principal component analysis | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
29 | 7 | 1051-8215 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
1 | 0.35 | 0 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Nan Zhou | 1 | 15 | 2.16 |
Hong Cheng | 2 | 703 | 65.27 |
Jing Qin | 3 | 132 | 14.27 |
Yuanhua Du | 4 | 64 | 3.49 |
Badong Chen | 5 | 919 | 65.71 |