Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
An important step in realizing the vision of both Web services and Grid is the provision of a robust, automatic and reliable solution for finding services or resources in such environments. Different solutions to this problem were already proposed, each with its specific model and realization. Although all solutions address the same problem, it is very difficult for a non-expert and even for an expert in the field to decide if and why one solution is better then another. This paper proposes a systematic set of criteria, a framework, that can help in the evaluation of different discovery approaches. Furthermore some of the most relevant discovery approaches in Web services and Grid environments are surveyed and evaluated according to the proposed evaluation framework. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2007 | 10.3233/MGS-2007-3306 | Multiagent and Grid Systems |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
systematic set,different solution,relevant discovery approach,web services,web services environment,web service,important step,grid environment,different discovery approach,proposed evaluation framework,reliable solution,specific model,grid,discovery,evaluation framework.,matchmaking | Services computing,World Wide Web,Computer science,Web modeling,Semantic grid,Web service,WS-Policy,Grid | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
3 | 3 | 1574-1702 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
12 | 0.78 | 13 |
Authors | ||
8 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Ioan Toma | 1 | 343 | 36.74 |
Kashif Iqbal | 2 | 107 | 9.34 |
Dumitru Roman | 3 | 434 | 52.28 |
Thomas Strang | 4 | 272 | 37.76 |
Dieter Fensel | 5 | 5545 | 662.62 |
Brahmananda Sapkota | 6 | 124 | 15.06 |
Matthew Moran | 7 | 575 | 45.98 |
Juan Miguel Gomez | 8 | 60 | 9.66 |