Title
Do micro-level tutorial decisions matter: applying reinforcement learning to induce pedagogical tutorial tactics
Abstract
Pedagogical tutorial tactics are policies for a tutor to decide the next action when there are multiple actions available. When the contents were controlled so as to be the same, little evidence has shown that tutorial decisions would impact students' learning. In this paper, we applied Reinforcement Learning (RL) to induce two sets of tutorial tactics from pre-existing human interaction data. The NormGain set was derived with the goal of enhancing tutorial decisions that contribute to learning while the InvNormGain set was derived with the goal of enhancing those decisions that contribute less or even nothing to learning. The two sets were then compared with human students. Our results showed that when the contents were controlled so as to be the same, different pedagogical tutorial tactics would make a difference in learning and more specifically, the NormGain students outperformed their peers.
Year
DOI
Venue
2010
10.1007/978-3-642-13388-6_27
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (1)
Keywords
Field
DocType
human student,micro-level tutorial decisions matter,normgain student,invnormgain set,pedagogical tutorial tactic,normgain set,pre-existing human interaction data,tutorial decision,tutorial tactic,reinforcement learning,different pedagogical tutorial tactic,artificial intelligence,human interaction
TUTOR,Computer science,Knowledge management,Human interaction,Human learning,Artificial intelligence,Error-driven learning,Machine learning,Reinforcement learning
Conference
Volume
ISSN
ISBN
6094
0302-9743
3-642-13387-8
Citations 
PageRank 
References 
33
1.29
38
Authors
3
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Min Chi1487.00
Kurt VanLehn22352417.44
Diane J. Litman33542484.90