Paper Info
Title
Rationale, Implementation and Evaluation of Assistive Strategies for an Active Back-Support Exoskeleton.
Abstract
Active exoskeletons are potentially more effective and versatile than passive ones, but designing them poses a number of additional challenges. An important open challenge in the field is associated to the assistive strategy, by which the actuation forces are modulated to the user's needs during the physical activity. This paper addresses this challenge on an active exoskeleton prototype aimed at reducing compressive low-back loads, associated to risk of musculoskeletal injury during manual material handling (i.e., repeatedly lifting objects). An analysis of the biomechanics of the physical task reveals two key factors that determine low-back loads. For each factor, a suitable control strategy for the exoskeleton is implemented. The first strategy is based on user posture and modulates the assistance to support the wearer's own upper body. The second one adapts to the mass of the lifted object and is a practical implementation of electromyographic control. A third strategy is devised as a generalized combination of the first two. With these strategies, the proposed exoskeleton can quickly adjust to different task conditions (which makes it versatile compared to using multiple, task-specific, devices) as well as to individual preference (which promotes user acceptance). Additionally, the presented implementation is potentially applicable to more powerful exoskeletons, capable of generating larger forces. The different strategies are implemented on the exoskeleton and tested on 11 participants in an experiment reproducing the lifting task. The resulting data highlights that the strategies modulate the assistance as intended by design, i.e., they effectively adjust the commanded assistive torque during operation based on user posture and external mass. The experiment also provides evidence of significant reduction in muscular activity at the lumbar spine (around 30%) associated to using the exoskeleton. The reduction is well in line with previous literature and may be associated to lower risk of injury.
Year
DOI
Venue
2018
10.3389/frobt.2018.00053
FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI
Keywords
Field
DocType
exoskeleton,powered,manual material handling,strategy,myocontrol,electromyography
Musculoskeletal injury,Torque,Simulation,Computer science,Material handling,Exoskeleton,Artificial intelligence,Biomechanics,Robotics
Journal
Volume
ISSN
Citations 
5.0
2296-9144
6
PageRank 
References 
Authors
0.67
8
8
Name
Order
Citations
PageRank
Stefano Toxiri1101.91
Axel S. Koopman291.20
Maria Lazzaroni3101.76
Jesus Ortiz4679.14
Valerie Power5152.69
Michiel de Looze6151.67
Leonard O'Sullivan7142.63
Darwin G. Caldwell82900319.72