Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Automatic classification of blur type is critical to blind image restoration. In this paper, we propose an original solution for blur type classification of digital images using ensemble Support Vector Machine (SVM) structure. It is assumed that each image is subject to at most one of three blur types: haze, motion, and defocus In the proposed technique, 35 blur features are first calculated from image spatial and transform domains, and then ranked using the SVM-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) method, which is also adopted to optimize the parameters of the Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel of SVMs. Moreover, Support Vector Rate (SVR) is used to quantify the optimal number of features to be included in the classifiers. Finally, the bagging random sampling method is utilized to construct the ensemble SVM classifier based on a weighted voting mechanism to classify the types of blurred images. Numerical experiments are conducted over a sample dataset to be called Beihang Univ. Blur Image Database (BHBID) that consists of 1188 simulated blurred images and 1202 natural blurred images collected from popular national and international websites (Baidu.com, Flicker.com, Pabse.com, etc.). The experiments demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed ensemble SVM classifier by comparing it with single SVM classifiers as well as other state-of-the-art blur classification methods. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1016/j.image.2018.08.003 | Signal Processing: Image Communication |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Blur image classification,Support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE),Support vector rate (SVR),Feature ranking,Feature selection,Ensemble SVM classifier | Kernel (linear algebra),Computer vision,Radial basis function,Ranking,Computer science,Support vector machine,Digital image,Weighted voting,Sampling (statistics),Artificial intelligence,Image restoration | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
71 | 0923-5965 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 14 | 4 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rui Wang | 1 | 3 | 3.15 |
| Wei Li | 2 | 28 | 5.33 |
| Rui Li | 3 | 209 | 59.97 |
| Liang Zhang | 4 | 121 | 17.53 |