Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
In the context of mobile-based user-interface (UI) attacks, the common belief is that clickjacking is a solved problem. On the contrary, this paper shows that clickjacking is still an open problem for mobile devices. In fact, all known academic and industry solutions are either not effective or not applicable in the real-world for backward compatibility reasons. This work shows that, as a consequence, even popular and sensitive apps like Google Play Store remain, to date, completely unprotected from clickjacking attacks. After gathering insights into how apps use the user interface, this work performs a systematic exploration of the design space for an effective and practical protection against clickjacking attacks. We then use this exploration to guide the design of ClickShield, a new defensive mechanism. To address backward compatibility issues, our design allows for overlays to cover the screen, and we employ image analysis techniques to determine whether the user could be confused. We have implemented a prototype and we have tested it against ClickBench, a newly developed benchmark specifically tailored to stress-test clickjacking protection solutions. This dataset is constituted by 104 test cases, and it includes real-world and simulated benign and malicious examples that evaluate the system across a wide range of legitimate and attack scenarios. The results show that our system is able to address backward compatibility concerns, to detect all known attacks (including a never-seen-before real-world malware that was published after we have developed our solution), and it introduces a negligible overhead.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1145/3243734.3243785 | ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security |
Field | DocType | ISBN |
Clickjacking,Android (operating system),Computer security,Computer science,Mobile device,Test case,Overlay,Malware,User interface,Backward compatibility | Conference | 978-1-4503-5693-0 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 14 |
Authors | ||
5 | ||
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Possemato | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Andrea Lanzi | 2 | 845 | 40.99 |
| Simon P. Chung | 3 | 165 | 13.46 |
| Wenke Lee | 4 | 9351 | 628.83 |
| Aloysius K. Mok | 5 | 79 | 7.92 |