Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
Alluxio is a popular distributed memory storage system, which becomes increasingly important in big data ecosystem by providing high performance storage for computing framework. We point out that there are security vulnerabilities in cache mechanism, data short-circuit read/write mechanism and consistency check mechanism of Alluxio, which may result in the failure of data availability and integrity. Firstly, we find that the lack of limitation of cached copies in the cache mechanism causes the malicious memory consumption attack. An adversary can craft a malicious job to consume the scarce memory storage at a low cost, which will significantly influence the performance of normal users with a degradation of 20%-59%. Secondly, we are aware that the lack of access control and integrity check on the data block will lead to target file tamper attack, in which a target file cached in memory will be modified and considered correctly as long as the size remains unchanged. The tampered file will be read and thus causes a wrong result. Finally, we discuss some corresponding countermeasures for defending these two kinds of memory cache attacks. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2018 | 10.1109/BDCloud.2018.00069 | 2018 IEEE Intl Conf on Parallel & Distributed Processing with Applications, Ubiquitous Computing & Communications, Big Data & Cloud Computing, Social Computing & Networking, Sustainable Computing & Communications (ISPA/IUCC/BDCloud/SocialCom/SustainCom) |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Alluxio,Memory cache,Attack,Availability,Integrity,Security vulnerabilities | Cache,CPU cache,Computer data storage,Computer security,Computer science,Block (data storage),Distributed memory,Access control,Adversary,Big data,Multimedia | Conference |
ISSN | ISBN | Citations |
2158-9178 | 978-1-7281-1141-4 | 1 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.36 | 0 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Yizhe Yang | 1 | 1 | 0.36 |
Qingni Shen | 2 | 71 | 22.47 |
Wu Xin | 3 | 1 | 0.36 |
Wenjun Qian | 4 | 2 | 0.71 |
Yahui Yang | 5 | 48 | 11.83 |
Zhonghai Wu | 6 | 34 | 12.36 |