Title | ||
---|---|---|
Using improved particle swarm optimization to tune PID controllers in cooperative collision avoidance systems. |
Abstract | ||
---|---|---|
The introduction of proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers into cooperative collision avoidance systems (CCASs) has been hindered by difficulties in their optimization and by a lack of study of their effects on vehicle driving stability, comfort, and fuel economy. In this paper, we propose a method to optimize PID controllers using an improved particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, and to better manipulate cooperative collision avoidance with other vehicles. First, we use PRESCAN and MATLAB/Simulink to conduct a united simulation, which constructs a CCAS composed of a PID controller, maneuver strategy judging modules, and a path planning module. Then we apply the improved PSO algorithm to optimize the PID controller based on the dynamic vehicle data obtained. Finally, we perform a simulation test of performance before and after the optimization of the PID controller, in which vehicles equipped with a CCAS undertake deceleration driving and steering under the two states of low speed (≤50 km/h) and high speed (≥100 km/h) cruising. The results show that the PID controller optimized using the proposed method can achieve not only the basic functions of a CCAS, but also improvements in vehicle dynamic stability, riding comfort, and fuel economy. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
---|---|---|
2017 | 10.1631/FITEE.1601427 | Frontiers of IT & EE |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Cooperative collision avoidance system (CCAS), Improved particle swarm optimization (PSO), PID controller, Vehicle comfort, Fuel economy, TP39 | Motion planning,Particle swarm optimization,MATLAB,PID controller,Computer science,Control theory,Vehicle driving,Collision,Acceleration | Journal |
Volume | Issue | ISSN |
18 | 9 | 2095-9184 |
Citations | PageRank | References |
0 | 0.34 | 10 |
Authors | ||
5 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
---|---|---|---|
Xing-chen Wu | 1 | 0 | 0.68 |
Guihe Qin | 2 | 23 | 9.00 |
Ming-Hui Sun | 3 | 8 | 3.83 |
He Yu | 4 | 4 | 3.14 |
Qian-yi Xu | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |