Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
Potential negative outcomes of machine learning and algorithmic bias have gained deserved attention. However, there are still relatively few standard processes to assess and address algorithmic biases in industry practice. Practical tools that integrate into engineers' workflows are needed. As a case study, we present two tooling efforts to create tools for teams in practice to address algorithmic bias. Both intend to increase understanding of data, models, and outcome measurement decisions. We describe the development of 1) a prototype checklist based on existing literature frameworks; and 2) dashboarding for quantitatively assessing outcomes at scale. We share both technical and organizational lessons learned on checklist perceptions, data challenges and interpretation pitfalls.
|
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1145/3290607.3299057 | CHI Extended Abstracts |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
algorithmic accountability, algorithmic bias, bias and data checklist, industry practice | Checklist,Data science,Computer science,Human–computer interaction,Workflow,Perception | Conference |
ISBN | Citations | PageRank |
978-1-4503-5971-9 | 3 | 0.38 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Henriette Cramer | 1 | 453 | 30.36 |
| Jean Garcia-Gathright | 2 | 15 | 4.06 |
| Sravana Reddy | 3 | 29 | 6.18 |
| Aaron Springer | 4 | 24 | 5.86 |
| Romain Takeo Bouyer | 5 | 3 | 0.38 |