Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The brain activity pattern can be presented by Electroencephalogram (EEG), which is considered as an alternative to traditional biometrics. Researchers have done conducted studies on EEG-based identification, while few of them discussed the effect of time robustness which is very important for the identification system. In this study, we compared and analyzed the two runs EEG signals of resting-state of eye open/closed (REO/REC). The time intervals between two runs were at least two weeks. Here are 17 participants joined in this study. Each of them took two runs experiment. Each run contains four sessions, each session includes 150 seconds of REO/REC. Spectral and statistical analyses were used to extract feature. Three classifiers, Euclidean distance, SVM, and LDA, were used to get classification accuracies and to compare the performance between features of each run and two runs. The results of two runs PSD values of both REO and REC conditions show that there is a similarity within each subject and a difference between subjects. The classification accuracies of three methods of each run are almost 99%. The classification accuracies using two runs data as training set can also reach up to 97% while using each of two-run data as training set is nearly 80%. Thus, the features of most subjects have cross-time robustness and could be used as identification. This study will have an important role in EEG-based identification system. |
Year | DOI | Venue |
|---|---|---|
2019 | 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907644 | IEEE ACCESS |
Keywords | Field | DocType |
Electroencephalography(EEG),identification,resting-state,robustness | Pattern recognition,Computer science,Resting state fMRI,Identification system,Support vector machine,Euclidean distance,Robustness (computer science),Brain activity and meditation,Artificial intelligence,Biometrics,Electroencephalography,Distributed computing | Journal |
Volume | ISSN | Citations |
7 | 2169-3536 | 0 |
PageRank | References | Authors |
0.34 | 0 | 6 |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yang Di | 1 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Xingwei An | 2 | 21 | 11.88 |
| Feng He | 3 | 16 | 9.45 |
| Shuang Liu | 4 | 36 | 22.95 |
| yufeng ke | 5 | 1 | 7.78 |
| Dong Ming | 6 | 105 | 51.47 |