Name
Abstract | ||
|---|---|---|
The two major systems of formal verification are model checking and algebraic model-based testing. Model checking is based on some form of temporal logic such as linear temporal logic (LTL) or computation tree logic (CTL). One powerful and realistic logic being used is CTL, which is capable of expressing most interesting properties of processes such as liveness and safety. Model-based testing is based on some operational semantics of processes (such as traces, failures, or both) and its associated preorders. The most fine-grained preorder beside bisimulation (mostly of theoretical importance) is based on failure traces. We show that these two most powerful variants are equivalent; that is, we show that for any failure trace test there exists a CTL formula equivalent to it, and the other way around. All our proofs are constructive and algorithmic. Our result allows for parts of a large system to be specified logically while other parts are specified algebraically, thus combining the best of the two (logic and algebraic) worlds. |
Year | Venue | DocType |
|---|---|---|
2019 | arXiv: Logic in Computer Science | Journal |
Volume | Citations | PageRank |
abs/1901.10925 | 0 | 0.34 |
References | Authors | |
0 | 5 | |
Name | Order | Citations | PageRank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan D. Bruda | 1 | 62 | 12.18 |
| Sunita Singh | 2 | 0 | 0.68 |
| A. F. M. Nokib Uddin | 3 | 0 | 0.34 |
| Zhiyu Zhang | 4 | 0 | 2.03 |
| Rui Zuo | 5 | 0 | 0.34 |